Saturday, March 21, 2009

A Masterpiece Of A Work In Progress

From the moment that we landed in Istanbul, it was clear that Kivunim’s time in Turkey would be equal parts eye-opening and full of familiar, or at least fitting, steps in our journey.  Embodying the “third time’s a charm” ethic as our third international trip this year, our time in Turkey brought me to a new level of endearment to the international story of the Jewish people that we are trying to reclaim this year, and represented in many ways the core and climax of everything we have done thus far.  Even from a linguistic perspective I challenged myself more during this trip than on any other before to learn local phrases.  Above all, our visit to Turkey this past week was evidence of progress—not just in terms of our year and our development as students of the world, but also in visiting a place, like many others where we have been and have yet to go, where the process of the development of human civilization, and many of its different stages, are especially evident.

As I mentioned briefly in my last entry, Turkey is about as “in between” as a place gets.  I maintain that every place we have visited, perhaps especially Jerusalem, holds the seeds of converging cultures and civilizations.  However, I must admit that few other places in the world are as much of a crossroads as Turkey.  Turkey borders Greece and Bulgaria on one side, and Georgia, Armenia, Iran, and Syria on the other.  It is at once Asian, European, Middle Eastern, and not quite any of these.  Over the course of the week, moving from Istanbul to Ankara and eventually to Izmir, we physically traveled inter-continentally, while staying inside one country.  The cross-cultural nature of Turkey centers on Istanbul.  A city physically split between Europe and Asia by the Bosphorous Strait, it has served as the seat of government for both Eastern and Western powers.  Many parts of Istanbul could easily be London or Madrid (or Athens or Haifa for that matter), but the minarets of its plethora of mosques dominate the skyline. 

As soon as we got off the plane from Tel Aviv, we made our way to the ancient Roman Hippodrome and the Blue Mosque of Ottoman Sultan Ahmet I, and then saw the two cultures combined just across the square in the Hagia Sophia—one of the world’s most majestic Byzantine churches (in fact, it was the largest cathedral in the world for a thousand years), which was turned into a mosque shortly after the Ottomans captured Istanbul (then Constantinople) in 1453, and then into a museum in 1935 when the Republic of Turkey was established.  I find it pretty profound that one building can hold the remnants of so many chapters of Turkish history.  The Blue Mosque and the Hagia Sophia are awe-inspiring in their sheer size and style.  They are truly tremendous feats of architecture, especially given the tools that the builders had when they were constructed.  At first glance they appear to be sister buildings; they stand opposite one another, with their massive domes complementing each other.  Yet their constructions were separated by over a thousand years.  It is quite striking to consider how the style of Istanbul’s mosques, which most clearly demonstrate the city’s Muslim character, must have been inspired by Christian innovations in religious architecture.  The roots of this interaction between cultures, especially on a religious and architectural level, made me feel right at home.  Indeed, the relationship between the Hagia Sophia and the Blue Mosque is all too reminiscent of Jerusalem’s Church of the Holy Sepulcher and the Dome of the Rock, which also share almost eerily identical measurements in their domes—not to mention the less physical historical parallels in Istanbul and Jerusalem of the relationship between Islam and Christianity, and Romans and Ottomans, that such buildings represent.

After visiting the Blue Mosque and Hagia Sophia, we went to Istanbul’s Grand Covered Bazaar, which was yet another interesting variation—after Morocco in particular—of the marketplace culture that is so integral to life in the Middle East and the development of international trade that connects and affects the world today.  What was most thrilling about the bazaar in Istanbul, again, was the multicultural and multilingual atmosphere.  While I was there I spoke English, Arabic, Spanish, Hebrew, and even a few words of Turkish, employing basically all of my linguistic tools in one market.  The vibe of cross-cultural interaction took on an almost playful air as the shopkeepers tried to guess their customers’ origins (at two separate shops I was asked if either of my parents were from Syria or Iraq!).

Over the course of the next couple of days in Istanbul, we experienced the city through several different lenses.  We met with the Chief Rabbi of Turkey, a charming and wise man, who entreated us to greet our future with a smile on our faces.  We visited Istanbul’s Jewish school, which was an impressive institution, with high ideals and expectations and state-of-the-art facilities.  Turkey doesn’t allow religion to be taught in schools, so the school had integrated its Jewish curriculum into an ethics class based on Jewish values.  We had a dance party with some of Istanbul’s Jewish youth, and learned more about the Ladino (Judeo-Spanish) music culture of Istanbul’s Sephardic (expelled-from-Spain) Jewish community.

We spent Shabbat in Istanbul, mostly dividing our time between an Ashkenazi synagogue and an old-age home where we ate our meals, while overlooking an absolutely breathtaking view of the city.  Praying in an Ashkenazi synagogue, in a country that we associate much more heavily with the Sephardic Jews, who were taken in by the Ottoman Empire in 1492, was an interesting reminder of Turkey’s complexity.  We visited a number of old synagogues and museums, where we saw chanukiot (Chanukah lamps) with the Turkish/Muslim crescent-and-star symbol and even one that resembled a model of a mosque’s minaret.  We visited a synagogue that had a bima/teva (podium for leading a prayer service) that was in the shape of a boat—Noah’s Ark, or a tribute to the Ottoman ships that brought these Jews to refuge from Spain?  After visiting Spain in January, it was fitting that Turkey would show us the pinnacle of the comfortable relationship that Sephardic Jews shared with Ottoman society, and also serve as a transition into the Ashkenazi culture that we will be studying in the coming weeks before our trip to Central Europe at the end of April.

On our last day in Istanbul, we visited Topkapi Palace, which was the home of the Sultan when Istanbul was the Ottoman Empire’s capital.  We saw the Sultan’s ceremonial clothing and jewels.  We visited the old Harem, where women from all over the world were kept for the Sultan.  We even saw relics of the Prophet Mohammed.  At the end, the palace compound opened up to the best view of the Bosphorous Strait that the city has to offer.  I felt overwhelmed as I stood literally on the boundary between Europe and Asia.  The culturally and historically diverse and fluid identity of this place was suddenly manifest in a shockingly physical way.  Seeing both continents was as simple as looking over a relatively narrow body of water, even as I could only imagine what truly lay over the horizon in front of me and behind me.  I looked downstream towards the Marmara Sea, which feeds into the Aegean Sea through the Dardanelles, and then into the Mediterranean towards Israel, Greece, Spain and Morocco.  I looked upstream towards the Black Sea and Bulgaria.  I felt the entire curriculum of Kivunim thus far converging on this point.  I closed my eyes and heard people speaking English, Arabic, Spanish, Chinese, German, Turkish, and many other languages that I couldn’t understand.  Maybe it is just a tourist hot spot that brings people together, but there’s nothing like tourism in Istanbul.  Later that night we would cross the bridge over the Bosphorous, and board an overnight sleeper train to Turkey’s capital of Ankara.

Our tour guides would compare Ankara’s relationship with Istanbul to that Washington D.C. with New York City.  If Istanbul is the country’s cultural crown jewel, then Ankara is the heart of the national identity.  The capital of Turkey was moved to Ankara when the modern Republic was founded, largely because the War of Independence had been waged from its more central location.  The most obvious manifestation of Ankara’s importance to national identity, besides the government buildings, is the Mausoleum of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.  From a Turkish standpoint, this might be the most important stop in our entire trip.  Ataturk literally means “father of the Turks.”  He was a military genius, who became the Republic’s first head of state, with seemingly endless political capital.  He is all but personally credited with saving the country by winning back key territories that were apportioned to other nations when the Ottoman Empire dissolved, and enacting major cultural reforms that secularized and modernized the country (try changing the alphabet from Arabic to Latin overnight). 

Today, Turkey’s increasingly Muslim government is a bit at odds with the secular elites, who have their own sort of religion in Ataturk.  Everywhere one goes in Turkey, Ataturk’s portrait is posted—in restaurants, hotel lobbies, schools, city-centers, and taxis.  For a group of American Jews, his ubiquity was intriguing, if not a bit startling.  A large part of our study this year has concerned the role of heroes and myth in a nation’s identity, but if there are parallels between Washington and Ankara then imagine what the National Mall would be if the entire area was dedicated to one person.  Structurally, the Mausoleum may resemble the Lincoln Memorial (visa vis the Parthenon), and Americans certainly tell their own story through grand structures in the capital, but Ataturk’s Mausoleum is a unique place, and, as any Turk will tell you, Ataturk was a pretty unique guy.

We also visited the old city of Ankara, the latest in a series of citadels and acropolises that we will visit this year, beyond the one we live next to in Jerusalem.  We toured the Anatolian Civilizations Museum, which is ranked among the best museums in Turkey, showcasing the ancient culture of the region, dating back tens of thousands of years to the Hittite tribes and beyond.  Rarely do the routes to our roots take us all the way back to our origins as human beings, but that is the essence of the civilizations that we study—in their differences and common origins.

Another feature of our stay in Ankara was the city’s synagogue.  This was one of the most sobering experiences of the trip.  Besides the fact that the police had specially opened the synagogue for our visit, and were stationed all along the route to the entrance (precautions after the recent conflict in Gaza caused local unrest in Ankara), we also found a community that was in dire straits.  We met the 21-year-old daughter of the president of the Jewish community of Ankara.  She was confused as to why a Jewish group would choose to come so far to visit the synagogue, or even the city itself.  She said she plans to move out of the country, and expressed pretty definitively that she expects her community to cease to exist in the future.  Kivunim has made it a sort of tradition, since our first trip to Greece, to sing in all the synagogues that we visit.  We have filled many all but empty synagogues, but this one was especially powerful to see.  Here was a synagogue where we didn’t just find older caretakers; the representative of the community’s future had also given up hope in the long-term continuity of her community. 

For us, this encounter was simply very sad.  However, it also represented concretely how important this year is, and, frankly, as we spent the rest of the day with our new Turkish friend, I began to wonder if our visit might lead to a change of heart.  As our director Peter has reminded us, we are not simply students or even representatives of North American Jewry on these trips.  As powerful as these travels are for us, we are also engaged in a reciprocal process with the people that we meet, as evidence of the value of international interaction, and—when it comes to the Jews—of reacquainting each other and ourselves with the global story and identity of the Jewish people, on behalf of our shared future.

After leaving Ankara we made our way to Afyon.  On the way we stopped in Gordium, which is where Alexander the Great cut the legendary Gordion Knot.  It is also the site of many tumuli, or hills constructed as tombs, where notables of the city were buried.  There were also ruins from the Hittite period, and then Greek, and then Roman, and so on. Afyon is a beautiful small city with Turkish baths and Turkish coffee—neither of which, our tour guide told us, happen to be Turkish.  Turkish baths are Roman and Turkish coffee is Arab.  Early in the morning we climbed a rock formation in the middle of the city to a citadel, from which we viewed the entire city in all directions, with the majestic Taurus Mountains in the distance.

En route from Afyon to Izmir, we stopped to visit Sardis, home of an ancient synagogue.  We have visited many ancient ruins during this year, but to see evidence of Jewry in such antiquity was very powerful.  Of course Jerusalem brings us about as close as possible to ancient Jewry, but seeing a synagogue with its columns and internal structures surviving its roof, painted an image like so many Greek and Roman ruins, and hit a different chord of Jewish historical resonance altogether.  Being at ancient ruins usually leads to more general societal projections—about the Parthenon as a model for the Empire State Building in the 45th century for example—but Sardis gave this idea a Jewish twist.  I found myself thinking back to the future of emptiness anticipated soon for the synagogue in Ankara, and wondering what our modern synagogues will look like and hold in thousands of years—and, of course, whether we will have new ones that make our contemporary structures look ancient in their own way…  The synagogue in Sardis also happened to be gigantic, at one time housing a thousand people.  Of all the synagogues we have visited this year that have no community or a diminishing one, few ever held a thousand people, so Sardis represented a peak in the trend, in age, size, and emptiness. 

In Izmir we visited another Jewish youth group, and danced to Israeli music (so far from the summer camp where I learned them!) over dinner.  During our last day in Turkey we visited a number of old synagogues in Izmir and one last bazaar.  Our visit to these synagogues was personally very special, because of one completely unexpected encounter.  We met an older woman named Esther Benmayor, who has become a volunteer caretaker for the city’s synagogues, making sure that the buildings are maintained as part of the city’s Jewish culture, right in the heart of the bazaar.  Besides the meaning of Esther’s work in the interest of keeping up the Jewish community’s heritage spots in Izmir, her acquaintance was particularly exciting for me because there had been a Professor Isaac Benmayor from Salonika on the speakers panel that I was a part of at the UN in January.  When I asked Esther if she had any family in Salonika, she got very excited by the idea that maybe I was a Benmayor.  Her father was from Salonika, but she said he never talked about it, so she wasn’t in contact with any family that she might have there. 

Only time will tell if the two are in fact family, but, regardless, this experience was a powerful example of the bridges that this program builds between Jews all around the world. I have never felt so viscerally connected to anyone we have met in our travels as I did when I talked to Esther.  We were both on the brink of tears as we talked about and experienced in real time the importance of seeking out and “remembering” our own story as Jews, a story that has been lost, or perhaps never truly fleshed out before, of a people that has lived in over fifty countries and, in Peter’s words, worn every costume, listened to and danced to every music, eaten every food, and spoken more languages than any other single people.  I was exhilarated by the idea that such foundational recent experiences in my life might actually bring someone else’s family together across borders.  For Esther the idea of finding lost relatives was overwhelming, and the fact that I was invested in her story and her family was touching.  For both of us the reality that our stories are shared was what brought tears to our eyes.

After lunch in the bazaar we boarded a bus to Ephesus—an ancient city in the heart of Anatolia that serves as one of the most comprehensive ruins of Hellenistic society.  The difficulty of trying to imagine that a quarter of a million people lived in this city at one point (put in perspective by the fact that only 160,000 live in Afyon, which we had seen in expanse from a mountaintop) lessened dramatically when we set eyes on the huge amphitheater that is still all but intact.  Then we got back on the bus to return to Izmir’s airport, to lay eyes on our last unique vantage point of the Mediterranean Sea in our travels this year (rounded out by Israel, Greece, Morocco and Spain), to fly back to Istanbul (my first domestic flight in a country other than the United States) for a connection flight to Tel Aviv, to see once more the Bosphorous and its physical separation of Europe and Asia and the beautiful bridge that connects them, before flying back to Israel for the fourth time this year.

 


 

Looking back on our time in Turkey, I keep thinking about the mosaics that we saw at Gordium (not to forget those in the Hagia Sophia of course!).  Recently, in light of my thoughts about the importance of balancing appreciation for commonality and diversity, for specifics and the big picture, I have come to find the mosaic to be a poignant and powerful expression of these ideas.  The pattern recognition ability of human beings to find unity in disparate elements, and to maintain curiosity for individual parts of a whole, is embodied by the work of a mosaic artist.  He or she must meticulously pick and place each tiny piece of stone, all the while keeping the finished, zoomed out product in mind.  This is equally pertinent to the scientist, who learns about the world through a microscope or a telescope, or the politician who must balance short-term and long-term goals for societal development.

From Jerusalem to Istanbul, Kivunim has seen some of the world’s most beautiful mosaics this year, and I am always struck by how they develop in complexity and intricacy as we move through history.  A few monumental steps in that process are still evident today in Gordium.  When we looked at the Greek and Roman mosaics in Gordium, Peter took us through a quick study of art in the Torah.  He talked about how the Torah passively describes how the Golden Calf emerged in an almost supernatural way from the flames at the base of Mount Sinai, and how just a few chapters later we are introduced to the first Biblical artist Betzalel.  Besides Betzalel—the artist—Peter posited, no one else in the Torah is described as being full of the spirit of God.  This speaks to the same energy that I felt in Delphi, of our uniquely human power to create while feeling humbled by our idea of a Creator—or at least by the wonders of Creation. 

Places of ancient traces like Gordium and Delphi make one wonder what evidence of progress and capacity we will leave behind for generations to come in hundreds and thousands of years—not to mention whether those ancient artists and scientists were thinking far ahead enough to consider us.  Our ability to keep on making more and more beautiful and complicated mosaics is clearly evident; just look closely at the pixelated universe that we live in through television and computer screens.  We can see how such development is important today for artists, scientists and policymakers alike.  For me the challenge seems to be to recognize what such a balance for the particular and universal, the ability to zoom in and zoom out, could mean for us, and the questions that such a dynamic presents, in terms of how we interact and approach our public and private life, our academic and experiential learning, and our amateur and professional work—no matter what field we choose to enter.

I think art probably imitates life as much as life can imitate art.  Our unique ability as human beings to imagine and create mosaics is also part of a process of discovering the wonder of what already is.  Indeed, in so many ways the world and each of us is a breathtaking mosaic, including Turkey and any other place; looking up at the Milky Way, out over the Bosphorous, or into a friend’s eyes, we can see that the big picture is beautiful, but every level zooming in, even to an individual cell, is a universe of its own.  That being said, neither we nor our world are perfect.  The dynamic between our ability and our reality presents constant opportunity for growth.  Seeing different mosaics all over the world shows me that we must keep challenging ourselves to improve, and offer that positive change to the world.  A finished piece of artwork is wonderful, but in the scheme of human civilization and development each masterpiece is also a piece of a much greater work in progress.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

In Between: A View From The Halfway Point

Sundays on Kivunim are often filled with additional “experiential” educational programming, taking us on fieldtrips around new areas of Jerusalem, or outside the city altogether.  Over the course of the Sunday programs we have met a lot of interesting people and seen a lot of new places, or at least learned to look at familiar places in new ways.

The Sunday right after I returned to Israel from New York, Kivunim was visited by Daniel Rossing.  Mr. Rossing has worked in Israel’s Ministry of Religious Affairs, and today he directs the Jerusalem Center for Jewish-Christian Relations.  His program consisted of a short lecture on the history of Jerusalem, specifically regarding Jewish-Christian relations, which was followed by a walking tour of the Christian Quarter of the Old City of Jerusalem. 

Mr. Rossing’s lecture began with an introduction to Jerusalem as “City of the Between.”  He discussed this label from many points of view, but he began with the religious dimensions, talking about how Jerusalem is in many religious teachings the site of the final judgment between ascent to Heaven and descent into Hell.  Jerusalem is also a city caught in between sacred and secular, being a holy city for many, while having just elected a secular Mayor.  He talked about Jerusalem being a border between the past and the future, as different communities in his eyes seem to live in different centuries.  It is a city split between democracy and theocracy, between tradition and modernity, between dream and reality.  Perhaps most poignantly he talked about the “in betweeness” of Jerusalem’s citizens, explaining how Jews are a local majority but a regional minority, while Muslims are a local minority but a regional majority, and Christians are a double minority—perhaps exposing why he finds the Christian community so interesting in this context. 

His discussion of the many dualities existing in Jerusalem was very compelling to me.  Over the past few years I have become more and more interested in and conscious of the importance of appreciating the coexistence and synergy of diverse, and even seemingly opposing, elements in the world.  Indeed, as my roommate Jason and I have discussed, Rossing’s label for Jerusalem seems to apply to much more than just this city.  Especially that Sunday, as I reflected on the excitement of the past several weeks on the road, and began to settle back into life in Jerusalem, I found Rossing’s use of the term “in between” to describe quite aptly how I had felt over the course of all that time living out of a suitcase. 

By the time I returned to Jerusalem, almost two weeks ago, it had been nearly five weeks since I had lived in Beit Shmuel.  The last time I had packed up and rolled my suitcase out of our hostel had been on December 28th, the day that winter vacation started.  Since then I had traveled all around Israel for two weeks, and then flown from Tel Aviv to Casablanca via Istanbul.  I had spent a week breathing in Morocco, before making the continental shift from Africa to Europe on a ferry over the Strait of Gibraltar.  Then, just four days later, I had crossed the Atlantic Ocean and spent a week back in the warmth and winter of my hometown, before making my way back down to New York, and eventually flying back to Israel to take a bus back to Jerusalem.  It’s a lot to fit into so few sentences.  In fact, it’s the most I’ve ever fit into so few weeks.  Last year I spent almost five months looking forward to Kivunim, and now it seems that I fly to Israel with nary a few hours to spend in anticipation.

Those five weeks opened my eyes to more of the world than I’ve ever experienced, and I always seemed to have been experiencing the “in between.”  During those five weeks America finished its latest transfer of power between presidents.  In Morocco the in between was ever present: we were at the crossroads of Africa, Europe, Islam, and Arab civilization, with all the languages that go with them too; between democracy and monarchy; and between the desert and the sea.  When we crossed the Strait of Gibraltar, we felt in between worlds, just floating in transit.  In Spain we found ourselves in between many major religions and cultures, as we visited places that had seen the heights of Jewish, Muslim and Catholic cultures, in conflict and coexistence, at one point or another. 

There’s nothing like travel to make one feel in between, but especially on a plane.  The sense of transferring gravity, from one life to another, between the earth and outer space, makes us groggy as we try to adjust our biological clocks to the time at our destination.  When I landed in the United States, the familiarity overtook me.  I was home, but I felt more in between than ever as I felt the shortness and sweetness of my visit all at once; I asked myself, do I live here or have I moved out?  Something in between, no doubt.  My time living out of the suitcase, then in its fourth week, endured.  Arriving in New York City, feeling the familiar, almost overwhelming energy of millions of lives all playing out together in a dense and cosmopolitan city, and perhaps especially upon entry to the United Nations building, I felt more definitions of “in between” materializing.  When I boarded the plane back to Israel, just hours after speaking at the UN, days after leaving Spain, and weeks after I had flown out of Tel Aviv, I felt what seemed like an entire era of my life come to a close.  When I landed in the evening in Israel, after taking off in the evening of the previous day just hours before, I wondered where the day in between had gone.  As I looked out the window of the bus on my way from the airport to Jerusalem, I felt myself begin to slow down and finally find the calm to reflect on my travels.  With the fresh ink of the fifteenth stamp of the year drying in my passport, I felt a new sense of life in between being a seasoned tourist and a resident-at-ease sink in.

Today, February 12th, splits Kivunim in half.  Our first flight to Israel was October 12th, and we will be on our way back home on June 12th.  Indeed, my perspective on what it feels like to be in between seems to have been inspired by the natural rhythm and calendar of this year.  With four months of Kivunim behind me and four months ahead, I sit on the balcony of my new room at Beit Shmuel, looking out on the walls of Rossing’s Christian Quarter of the Old City of Jerusalem, with the tops of churches and mosques peaking over the ramparts.  Living yards from the Green Line, between Israel and the West Bank, as an individual I feel about as in between as any of the countries that we’ve visited.  I hope and imagine that it’s clear how deeply this year has impacted me so far.  I feel I have experienced growth in almost every area of my being, from my writing and my relationships to my dreams for the future and my knowledge of myself and the world.  Recently I have found myself torn between somewhat painful yet endearing nostalgia for the freshness of the fall and renewed motivation to explore through the spring.  Throughout the year I have joked about how time zones mean nothing to me anymore, but Rossing’s lecture could not have felt more pertinent than it did that Sunday.  The time since I returned to Israel has been full of reflections on how my peers and I will approach this second half of Kivunim, as a group and as individuals.  We have gone back to school, and are now watching the seasons change. 

We continue to struggle with our identities, between high school and college, as American Jews living very much on the inside and the outside of Israeli society.  In the past months this identity has been reflected in the election schedules of America and Israel, and our ability to really participate in them.  And of course, we are still somewhere in between war and peace here.  Soon we will see where we are going in that regard; with the Israeli election results released, we now begin another in between period as the next Israeli government and 18th Knesset takes shape.  We find ourselves with two prime minister candidates, who both gave victory speeches when the results were released.  While Tsipi Livni’s Kadima party received more votes than any other, the bloc of parties that would align in a coalition behind Bibi Netanyahu’s Likud party seems to beat out Livni for a presumptive majority in parliament.  If today has marked the point between the two halves of Kivunim, it has also brought us to a new place of convergence between two interpretations of victory in Israeli politics.

In a few weeks we will be traveling to Turkey, one of the most in between countries on earth.  While I have tried not to take for granted the in between nature of my life and the places I’ve seen, I’ve certainly become accustomed to expect it to a certain extent.  I am learning to recognize that so many places on earth find themselves at the crossroads of civilizations, and also to look for such “in betweeness” if it’s not initially apparent.  Indeed, Jerusalem may be a phenomenal example of such a localized fault line between cultures and ideas, but such intersections exist all over the place, and throughout history.  Entire peoples, like the Jews wandering in the desert, have found themselves in between, while Obama’s stimulus package finds itself moving slowing between status as a bill and a law. Yet, being in between is not just about transition; it is also about moderation and complexity.  It is about trying to achieve balance between seemingly opposite extremes, and recognizing that while places, people and ideas don’t simply fit into the categories that they may appear to represent at first, they do also fit together.

Living in between is exhausting.  It compels us to put aside time to reflect, so that we do not lose track of where we are in the process of such intense experiences, or allow ourselves to desensitize because of sheer inertia.  I know that the Kivunim experience and lifestyle will not last forever, but impermanence seems to be a fact of life.  Perhaps the way this “gap-year” (bridge- perhaps?) has taught me to appreciate life shines light on the most basic value of spending some time to take notice of the in between—for high school graduates and others too.  We’re all in between.  When we zoom in we may find ourselves between classes, careers, relationships, or stages of life.  Yet, when we zoom out we find ourselves between birth and death, and between past and future generations.  It is in that context, seeking a healthy balance between these two viewpoints, that I begin the next half of this gift of a year.

Saturday, February 7, 2009

International Commemoration at the United Nations

On Friday, January 23rd I boarded an intercontinental flight.  This year on Kivunim is full of such dramatic itineraries, but this one was particularly meaningful.  I woke up Friday in an empty hotel room in Madrid; all my roommates had left for an early flight back to Israel.  I met Kivunim’s director Peter Geffen in the lobby, and before I knew it we were on our way to the airport.  We would be flying from Madrid to the United States.

The idea of coming home during the year had always been up in the air.  My parents and I had flip-flopped several times between not wanting to ruin the momentum of the year and feeling that it was only logical that my international experience would have to include North America.  Yet, on December 31st, as I stood on the beach of Eilat, the southern tip of Israel, killing time before a New Years celebration, the decision of whether or not to go home was taken out of our hands. My phone rang.  When I heard Peter’s voice on the line, I thought for sure he was calling with an urgent security update as the situation in Gaza continued to unfold.  But his voice carried a different tone altogether.  He was calling with an invitation for me to speak at the United Nations.  After months of hopping from country to country, I would be going home and visiting international territory—perhaps the best expression of my goals for the year.

He had presented an excerpt of my writings about our trip to Greece and Bulgaria (from Routes to Roots entry “The Routes Less Traveled By”) at a Kivunim Board meeting.  One of the Board members, who directs the UN’s Global Teaching and Learning Project, thought it would be appropriate for me to speak at this year’s annual observance of the International Day of Commemoration of the Victims of the Holocaust at the UN.  By coincidence, this year’s week of commemoration programs would include a briefing on Sephardic, and specifically Greek, Jewry during the Holocaust.  Sitting on the panel would be the Greek Representative to the United Nations; an Oxford professor of modern Greek linguistics and son of a Greek Holocaust survivor; and a Holocaust survivor from Salonika, one of the most significant places in our travels to Greece.  At a briefing on such an unlikely subject—as far as mainstream Holocaust commemoration is concerned—I would be playing the unlikely role of youth representative.

From the moment I hung up the phone with Peter, I began to grapple with how best to approach such an assignment.  I realized that the only way to have integrity as a young speaker in such a forum would be to try as hard as possible to connect to the enormity of the topic.  I knew I wasn’t even close to being an expert, but at the same time I realized that I was part of a small handful of people my age who had been exposed to the stories of the Greek Jews.  I had to put my voice in context. 

As Thursday, January 29th, the day of the briefing, approached, I became more and more humbled by the subject matter.  I tried to reflect as honestly as possible on the Holocaust in general and on the specific stories of the Greek Jews.  I read other commemorative pieces about the Holocaust, seeing how people had broached the topic in the past. I tried to combine my own personal philosophy and family stories, the goals of Kivunim, and my experiences into a presentation that would express a representative perspective on the Holocaust, from a Jew, an American, and a member of Kivunim and my generation.  I would explore how the importance of constantly striving to enrich our perspective and collective memory of the Holocaust represents the broader importance of keeping these lesser-known stories alive in general—and how that relates to the many challenges that face my generation, in the Jewish community and beyond.

By the time my parents and I arrived in New York, the fact that I was speaking had become real enough that the final touches on my speech fell into place—though I’ll admit they often had to be dropped several times before they fell the right way.  It had been quite a powerful and eye-opening experience to immerse myself in the Holocaust commemoration mindset, and this process led me to places of equal parts sadness and hopefulness, intimidation and resolution.

It was the second time I had ever been to the United Nations building.  The first time was last summer as a counselor for a global activism program at my summer camp Tel Yehudah.  My parents and I met family and friends who had come in for the briefing, and then we made our way to the room where it would take place.  The room resembled a miniature version of the General Assembly.  There were between 300 and 400 seats, each of which had a desk and a microphone.  The seats wrapped around the stage at the front, where a series of microphones were set up with the names of the panelists and our moderator.  I felt the buzz that I had felt before public appearances in the past—the nerves giving way to shear excitement.  

I was the fourth and final speaker of the day, so I sat and listened to the other panelists for about an hour.  I was glad to have this opportunity to take in the mood of the event and continue to put my perspective in context.  Between viewpoints ranging from the political to the academic to the powerfully personal, the vibe in the room was somber and meditative—the feeling of a room full of people engaging in an experience of collective learning and introspection.  Once I began to speak I felt right at home.  I felt at peace with the voice I had found on the subject, and I felt even further endeared to my experiences in Greece.  After the hour-and-a-half of question-and-answer time following my speech, during which the audience and panelists got to know each other and their perspectives better, I talked briefly with a few representatives of different NGOs who had come to the event.  Then it was off to lunch with the family before heading back to the airport and Israel.

Today words cannot do justice to how grateful I feel to have had the opportunity, and the responsibility, to reflect on the questions that the briefing presented.  If this blog has been a meaningful way to process and get more out of my experiences in retrospect, then preparing for the briefing was the epitome of such a learning experience—forcing me to reexamine not only past experiences, but also a deeper past that I feel I have a responsibility to face.  I feel truly lucky to have seen how my philosophy and Kivunim’s vision fit into a professional context.  As much as I have felt so fortunate to be able to explore both my Jewish identity and my curiosity in the world in tandem on Kivunim, to be able to address Jewish questions that I believe transcend the Jewish world at the United Nations, of all places, was a symbolically fitting and humbling format for what has been one of my greatest privileges. 

My experience at the UN was not a climax but a jumping-off point to continuing to explore the challenges that face my generation and the concrete lessons we can learn from our past—perhaps especially when it comes to the Holocaust.  Whether we like it or not, these past events come to define entire cultures and public discourses.  However, the quality of that definition can only be determined by how we embrace our history and evaluate it as a means to get the most out of our present and future.  This, I think, represents the meaning of commemoration—as a deliberate effort to reflect and set goals, striving not to take history for granted and live conscientiously for the future.  Today I have renewed conviction to continue the journey and find further meaning in the stories that we tell ourselves.

 


 

The video webcast of the briefing can be found here: http://www.un.org/webcast/SE2009.html

Just look under January 29, 2009: NGO Briefing on "The Sephardic Jews in Greece: The Untold Story" in Observance of the International Day of Commemoration in Memory of the Victims of the Holocaust.

Below is the full text of my prepared remarks from the event:

Good morning.  Firstly, I would like to extend my most sincere thanks to Maria-Luisa Chávez, Bill Yotive, and everyone at the United Nations Department of Public Information, who have afforded me the opportunity to speak here today. Also, efharisto to Ambassador Alexandrakis, Professor Benmayor and Mr. Mullah.  I am honored and humbled to be here with you today.  I would especially like to thank Peter Geffen, the Director of Kivunim: New Directions.  Peter, today I speak on behalf of my peers when I say thank you for being our leader, our educator-in-chief, and an inspiration to us all. 

It is truly an honor to have been asked to participate in this discussion.  As an 18-year-old Jew from Boston with Eastern European ancestry, I feel I would be remiss not to acknowledge that I must seem like an unusual candidate to be speaking at an event focused on commemorating Sephardic and specifically Greek Jewry during the Holocaust.  Of course I don’t pretend to be any kind of expert on the topic, but the recent contact I have had with the powerful stories of the Greek Jews has revealed to me what I consider to be some of the most pressing questions facing my generation of Jews, as well as issues that transcend the Jewish world altogether—challenges we all face now as we move into the next chapter of history and Holocaust commemoration.

As a student on the Israel-based gap-year program Kivunim: New Directions, over the course of the past four months I have had the privilege of being exposed to a broad view of the Jewish people, an exploration of our history and culture that includes study of various Jewish communities that all too often lie outside the consciousness of North American Jews and the general mainstream Jewish narrative.  These studies are part of a rich academic curriculum that includes Hebrew and Arabic language studies, along with a Middle East Studies course that explores the history, politics and culture of the region through Jewish and Arab lenses.  The more my peers and I learn the more conscious we are that any year-long study of history and culture can really only touch the tip of the iceberg.  Nevertheless, this exposure feels increasingly significant, as we, many of whom have had over a decade of formal Jewish education, find these lesser-known threads of the Jewish narrative providing poignant addenda to our concept of what it means to be Jewish, developing parts of our Jewish identity that we never knew existed.

Such a sense of awe in deliverance from ignorance is perhaps most potent when our studies touch on the Holocaust.  Having left hardly any Jewish families on earth unaffected, and having led to watershed changes in the life and geography of those families, the Holocaust is an endlessly challenging subject that makes up much of the bedrock upon which modern Jewish identity develops.  As an only child, I grew up with the story of how my great-grandfather and namesake, Benjamin Perlstein, the youngest of twenty-two siblings and the only one to emigrate from Poland prior to the Holocaust, ended up also being the only one to escape the family’s fate at Auschwitz.  Yet today, observing Tuesday’s anniversary of the European liberation of Auschwitz, I feel the roots of my Jewish identity reaching into that bedrock that is the Holocaust, and wrapping around it in entirely new ways.

In the last week of this past November, Kivunim took its first international trip of the year, visiting Greece after a month of studying the roots of Jewish life there and its intersection with the broader history and culture of the country, as part of our World Jewish Civilizations course.  As we walked the streets of Salonika, which before Kivunim most of us had never even heard of let alone linked to our Jewish heritage, we tried to imagine the city teeming with Jewish life—a place where for centuries one out of every two people we met on the street could have been a Jew.  For the first eighteen years of my life, any international consciousness of my Jewish identity had been largely focused on the relationship between the United States and Israel, so standing in a synagogue with Jews chanting familiar prayers in the middle of Greece was a dramatic revelation in itself.  Yet it was really only when the congregation at one point began to pray in Spanish, or more accurately, Ladino, that I began to feel how deep this new avenue toward the heart of Jewish history could go.

As we met with the small remaining Jewish community in Salonika, perhaps the only thing as powerful as what we saw was what was missing.  Indeed, as remarkable as it was to experience Jewish life in Greece, the fact that it felt we were saying goodbye to the Jews of Salonika no sooner than having met them was not just a function of the briefness of our visit.  As we stood in Liberty Square, where the deportation of Salonika’s Jews was preceded by unconscionable public humiliation, we imagined how uprooted, terrified and betrayed these people must have felt.  Just behind us was the port, which used to close early on Fridays because even the stevedores in this city were Jewish, and they too observed the Sabbath.  To have to celebrate our discovery of this past center of Jewish culture, where Jews exiled from Spain in 1492 had found a new home under the Ottoman Turks, and at the same time mourn the loss of ninety percent of its nearly 50,000 Jews, who were taken to Auschwitz in 1943, was positively wrenching.  Realizing that so many hundreds of Greek Jewish families were at one point together with my own in that particular concentration camp, personalized their stories, challenging and enriching my own.

As incredibly unique and unexpected the richness of Jewish life in Salonika was, it would appear to contribute to an easy assumption that Greece was just one more European country that willingly gave up its Jews to the Nazis.  Yet, while the horrors are certainly real and unimaginable, we would learn that the reality is truly not so simple.  In contrast to the apologetic air in Salonika’s Liberty Square, we were shocked to find that the Holocaust memorial in Chalkida, a struggling community that claims to be the oldest community of Jews in Europe, pays tribute to the Greek Orthodox Bishop Grigorios, who hid many sacred objects from their synagogue in his church and facilitated the protection of ninety percent of Chalkida’s Jews.  This moving example of courage in the non-Jewish Greek community, in the face of Nazi threats against their Jewish neighbors and anyone found assisting the Jews, was not unique.  We learned of Greek Archbishop Damaskinos, who was responsible for saving thousands of Jews through initiatives to produce false baptismal certificates from the Greek Orthodox Church and appeal directly to the Germans, namely in the form of a letter written by the famous Greek poet Angelos Sikelianos that was signed by many prominent Greek citizens.  “In our national consciousness,” he wrote, “all the children of Mother Greece are an inseparable unity: they are equal members of the national body irrespective of religion or dogmatic differences.”  (He is speaking about Greece.  Perhaps today we could expand this statement to represent not only our ideals for minorities in all nations, but for the equality of all peoples around the world.)  These uplifting stories of heroism amidst such excruciatingly painful and threatening circumstances continue to remind us of humanity’s potential for redemption even in the darkest of times.  It is truly difficult to recognize now how little is known not just of these places, but these stories in particular—and not just among Jews, but Greeks and other students of the Holocaust as well.

Of course, when it comes to the Holocaust, in the end the pressure to settle for simplification is great.  It is certainly easy to despair.  While there are examples of courage and resolute moral principle in the face of senseless persecution, it is sometimes difficult to keep them in mind amidst the obvious and overwhelming devastation.  The sheer numbers of dead and the inconceivable actions of human beings against others challenge our capacity to accept the reality of this tragic chapter of human history.  Indeed, when we allow ourselves to lose track of the strands of courage, the instinct to preserve the Holocaust as merely a symbol of evil in our memory can be an excuse to neglect the exploration of its inevitable nuance.  We may begin to shy away not just from the examples of hope, but also from the depth and darkness of the individual stories, the diversity of the people, and the ultimate acknowledgement that even though those involved may have been dehumanized—both as perpetrators and as victims—we must not distance ourselves from them to the extent that we do not learn from the Holocaust as a human tragedy that relates to us all—perhaps especially now in our interconnected and technologically advanced 21st century world.

This cuts to the core of why it has been such an important experience for me and my peers to be exposed to the stories of Greek Jewry.  Kivunim’s mission to educate us about the Jews who live and have lived in countries and cultures of the world beyond our limited experience is not only an effort to broaden our sense of what it means to be Jewish, but also to foster the development of what our mentor Peter calls “world consciousness,” a term that I have come to define as a commitment to the challenges of embracing both the complexities and commonalities among us.  If anything, Kivunim has taught me that the story of the Jewish people can be a model for the story of humanity, of a group with seemingly endless diversity and fragmentation combined with an ultimately common core identity.  Perhaps, these experiences suggest, despite the many challenges that we currently face, the roots of the Jewish people’s transnational history and present day life may in fact embody the ideals for which the United Nations itself ultimately stands.

During our study-tour to Greece, we visited a synagogue in the town of Veria, which has been essentially entirely empty of Jews since World War II.  As the 51 of us held a short prayer service, we quite literally brought the synagogue back to life.  Perhaps never in its entire history had it housed a congregation made up entirely of so many young Jews—let alone Americans.  Being in Veria gave us a special sense of humbled empowerment, reminding us that the processes of history and society that seem to transcend us all as individuals really cannot happen without us.  However, foreshadowing the slow disappearance of many other Jewish communities around the world like Salonika and Chalkida, whose stories lie outside the mainstream Jewish consciousness, Veria is an example to us all of how important it is not to take anything for granted.  For if we are not careful to move forward conscientiously, our history can easily slip out of memory. 

When the day comes that my children are old enough to learn about the Holocaust, any remaining Holocaust survivors will likely not have been old enough during the War to remember much from its darkest days.  So today members of my generation and I ask ourselves: when that day comes—and it is on its way—will we remember the Holocaust?  Will we remember the Jews in places like Salonika, whose communities have all but fallen off the map because of their decimation?  Of course memory can never be truly perfect, but will we have risen to the challenge of forging a collective memory that is rich in detail and perspective?  Will we have succeeded in broadening our sense of who we are and where we stand in the process of history?  Will we have learned to balance appreciation for both complexity and commonality, difference and similarity, tragedy and redemption, specifics and the big picture?  For me these questions are at the core of the many seemingly pivotal tasks that appear to hinge on the aptness and agency of my generation—not just of Jews, not just of Americans or of Greeks, but of all peoples.  Thank you.